Grow My Therapy
Grow My TherapyGrow My Therapy — search visibility for psychotherapy practices
Most search advice is built for businesses that convert a small percentage of a large number. A psychotherapy practice is the opposite: a handful of long, committed pieces of work, where one additional client can represent a year of weekly sessions.
That changes what is worth doing. Volume becomes almost irrelevant. Being the right result for a small number of unusually careful readers becomes everything.
The arithmetic nobody does
Work out what a full caseload actually requires. For most psychotherapists it is a small number of new clients a year — because the work is long, people stay, and turnover is low. Set against that, a search phrase with fifty monthly searches in your city is not a small opportunity. It is possibly the whole thing.
This is liberating rather than limiting. It means you can ignore the phrases where you would be competing against directories and health systems, and instead build for searches that are specific enough to be uncontested: a particular kind of difficulty, a particular tradition of working, a particular experience that people are searching for someone to understand.
It also means content quality matters far more than content volume. The reader you want is patient, sceptical and reading closely. They will notice a page assembled from other pages, and they will notice one written by someone who has sat in the room. Which is why what we write is drafted from a sample of your own prose rather than from a brief.
A practice that needs six new clients a year does not have a traffic problem. It has a being-found-by-the-right-six problem, which is a different job.
The searches worth having
None of these are high volume. All of them signal a person who has thought about this for a while and is looking for something specific.
Lines we hold
Some standard search and conversion practice is legal, effective and completely wrong for a psychotherapy practice. We would rather say so up front than have you discover it in the drafts.
Publishing weekly to feed an algorithm produces pages nobody would defend. We would rather publish six pieces a year that are worth reading than fifty that are worth skimming, and the search results agree more often than people expect.
No countdowns, no exit popups, no “limited places” unless there genuinely are. The reader you want treats pressure as diagnostic information about you.
Both an ethical problem and a credibility one. What works better is describing what the process asks of someone, including the parts that are hard.
If inserting a phrase would make a sentence read oddly, we do not insert it. A page that reads like it was written for a machine loses precisely the reader who was going to stay for three years.
The unglamorous half
Before any content matters, the site has to be readable by machines and quick for humans. That work is invisible, one-off and disproportionately valuable — particularly for practices whose sites were built years ago by someone else, or assembled in a page builder that generates six hundred kilobytes of markup for a paragraph.
Then there is the local layer. Even a practice that fills mostly by referral gets found by people searching a neighbourhood, and a correctly configured Google Business Profile is the difference between appearing in that result and not existing in it.
Both of these are done once and then maintained, which suits a practice that does not want marketing to become an ongoing preoccupation. The site itself gets the same treatment in the website build.
The groundwork, in order
Questions we get
Partly, and it is worth being clear about which part. It will probably not replace your referral network, and we would not pitch it as though it will. What it does is make the referrals convert — because everyone who is given your name searches it — and it slowly adds a second source that does not depend on other people remembering you.
For a practice with a stable referral base, that is a modest, compounding gain rather than a transformation, and it should be priced and expected accordingly.
It shouldn’t, and if it does, something has been done wrong. The parts of search work that matter most for a practice like yours — structure, speed, headings, credentials, a complete local profile — do not touch your prose at all. Where copy does change, it is usually in the direction of specificity, which reads better rather than worse.
We will not insert a phrase that makes a sentence read oddly. That rule survives contact with the rankings.
One page, yes — for the small number of people searching a tradition by name, and for referring colleagues. But it should not be the front door. Most readers cannot evaluate an orientation and are not trying to; they are trying to work out whether you would understand something particular. Pages describing that do more, and they rank for more.
Less often than you have been told. For a depth practice, four to six substantial pieces a year, each properly built and internally linked, outperforms a weekly cadence of thin posts — and it is sustainable, which the weekly cadence is not. What matters is that each piece is genuinely the best answer to something.
You tell us, and the site changes: availability closed, waitlist rather than booking, or referral suggestions instead. The visibility keeps accruing quietly in the background, which is what you want — rebuilding it from cold when you have a gap two years later takes months.
That number decides everything else. We’ll show you what people are searching in your area, which of it is winnable, and how little of it you need. See the full marketing service or everything for psychotherapists.
No obligation · we will say if this is not worth doing
More for psychotherapists
Or see everything we do for psychotherapists in one place.