Grow My Therapy
Grow My TherapyGrow My Therapy — done-for-you writing for hypnotherapy practices
The most-searched question about your profession is whether it works, and almost nobody in the field has written a serious answer. The instinct is to avoid it, because engaging with the doubt feels like conceding it.
That instinct costs you the reader. The doubt already exists — they typed it into a search box — and the only question is whether it gets resolved by your answer or by a sceptic blog written by someone who has never been in a session.
The one to write first
A serious article on what the evidence supports would say: here is where the research is stronger, here is where it is thinner, here is what a course of sessions actually involves, and here is what would make me tell somebody to try something else first. Written that way it is more persuasive than any promise, because a reader can tell the difference between confidence and salesmanship within a paragraph.
It is also the piece that reaches people earliest. Somebody who reads it while merely curious becomes the person who searches “hypnotherapy for flying” four months later with your name already in mind.
What makes it work is the sourcing. The statistics circulating in this field mostly trace back to a summary of a summary with no underlying study, and publishing those is both an advertising risk and a credibility one with exactly the reader you want. Every number in a draft is traced or removed.
Send us the figures your training body gave you. We will show you where they actually come from, which is frequently nowhere.
What a hypnotherapy practice needs published
This is a smaller and more structured writing programme than most practices need, because hypnotherapy demand is issue-led rather than open-ended.
The checks that matter here
Alongside the standard nineteen checks, these constraints apply to every hypnotherapy draft — they are what keeps the content defensible and, incidentally, what makes it persuasive.
Not quit in one session, not guaranteed results. It is an advertising risk and it is the single fastest way to lose a sceptical reader.
Traced to primary research or removed. In this field that eliminates most of the numbers in circulation, which is exactly the point.
Support alongside medical care rather than treatment of a diagnosed condition, unless your scope genuinely covers it. Written to what you confirm, with anything unverified flagged rather than assumed.
We do not write scripts or anything intended to induce a state in a reader. That belongs in a room with a practitioner who has assessed the person.
Why this compounds faster here
Most therapy content is bound to a local market by licensure. Depending on how you practise, hypnotherapy frequently is not — which means an article answering “does hypnotherapy work for insomnia” can reach a national audience and feed an online practice, not just the people within driving distance.
That changes the arithmetic. A single well-made piece has a much larger addressable readership than the equivalent article for a local counseling practice, and the competition for it is thinner because so few practitioners write seriously.
It also feeds the channel where this specialty performs best. Myth-correction content is the highest-performing material a hypnotherapy practice can post, and it comes from the same source articles — written once, adapted for social rather than produced twice.
What each article does
Questions we get
The opposite, in our experience. The doubt is already there — the reader typed it into a search box before they found you. Addressing it directly, and being honest about where the evidence is thinner, reads as confidence. Avoiding it leaves the question to be answered by someone with no stake in getting it right.
Send them and we will trace them. Some are real and citable; a great many in this field lead back to a summary of a summary with no underlying study, and publishing those is a genuine risk.
Where a number cannot be sourced, we write around it — and the specific description that replaces it is usually more convincing than the number would have been.
Fewer than most, and more structured. The six core pieces, then one per issue you genuinely want more of. Beyond that, additional writing has diminishing returns compared with improving the issue pages themselves.
With care about framing. Support alongside medical care is defensible far more often than a claim to treat a condition, and the difference is not cosmetic — it affects both advertising compliance and what your regulator permits.
We write to the scope you confirm, and where we cannot verify what applies in your state we flag it and ask rather than guessing.
Yes. Nothing publishes under your name without your review, and revisions are unlimited. Corrections go into your brief so the same issue does not come back on the next piece.
It is the page most hypnotherapy practices are missing and the one that converts best. We will build the article from your words and show you. See everything we do for hypnotherapists.
No obligation · every statistic traced before you see it
More for hypnotherapists
Or see everything we do for hypnotherapists in one place.